Take note of the preview icon next to the green indicator (which should be yellow before the build). There is also a Build Project button at the lower right hand side of the dashboard, and it is here where CodeKit is pretty solid. This initial dashboard tells me that this app is definitely intended for coders who want to get past configuration and also communicate what is in their project without having to dive into an editor and touch individual files. Once you drop in the project folder, you will be taken to a screen with your project files and some information (you can add the folder as a project or a framework): This leads me to a soft first use case for this app: If you want to develop a website without using the command line to initiate and install modules, CodeKit is an interface that allows you to drag and drop your project folder to start the process: ![]() It is an alternative to the command line. ĬodeKit doesn’t use any special or proprietary software to compile and build. If you want to watch the tutorials before downloading, feel free to check out the tutorials here. You can decide to watch the video tutorials, but of course I went right in. It does this through a build process that minifies the code, optimizes resources, and compiles languages.Īfter you download the trial version, you will see this splash screen upon opening it on your Mac: But before we start doing cartwheels, let’s take a look at a few cases where this app will work and maybe not work for you.ĬodeKit is a Mac app (decidedly not available on the Mac App store) which uses a pretty intuitive GUI interface for task management. If you answered yes, then CodeKit may be right for you. Are you tired of configuring your app setup for compiling, transpiling, and bundling? Would you ever want to upload your code to one place and then click a few buttons to lint, build, debug, and optimize your code? Let's take an example of some flexbox code from the previous lesson. The vendor prefix kind of says "this is the Microsoft interpretation of an ongoing proposal." Thus, if the final definition of grid is different, Microsoft can add a new CSS property grid without breaking pages that depend on -ms-grid. Therefore, instead of adding grid to its CSS, it adds -ms-grid. At this point in time, Microsoft cannot be certain that the specification will not change. Let's furthermore say that Microsoft as an experiment decides to implement the proposed grid. Let's furthermore say that some people create a draft specification, but others disagree with some of the details. Let's say a W3C working group is discussing a grid declaration (which, incidentally, wouldn't be such a bad idea). Originally, the point of vendor prefixes was to allow browser makers to start supporting experimental CSS declarations. My favorite explanation of vendor prefixes comes from Peter-Paul Koch of QuirksMode: Have you ever seen CSS properties starting with -webkit-, -moz-, -ms- or -o-? Those thing are called vendor prefixes. Unfortunately, Android 4.1 and 4.3 only support the 2009 syntax, and IE10 only supports the 2012 syntax, so if you want maximum browser support you still need to use them. These implementations are very similar, but the syntax is different and the older versions don't support all of the newer features. It's extremely unlikely the syntax will change again. The current version uses display: flex and properties that begin with flex.The 2009 version used display: box and had properties that began with box.Since then, flexbox has gone through two major changes, leaving us with three versions of the syntax. It may seem like the flexbox is fairly new, but the first draft was actually done back in 2009. The process for building a new feature like flexbox into HTML and CSS is complex and lengthy. With flexbox, there are two things getting in the way of coding utopia: old versions of the syntax and vendor prefixes. If you like it, be sure to subscribe to the entire course over at Free Flexbox Starter Course. This article is the second part in my series on flexbox. I'll walk you through the problems it solves and how to set it up. In this article, I'll show you how this dream can become reality with a tool called Autoprefixer. There are no vendor prefixes or browser inconsistencies, no external libraries and no compilers. Not just any CSS, but pure CSS, the purest you can imagine. You sip a cool, refreshing drink, and sigh as gulls faintly caw in the distance.Ī gentle breeze lightly brushes your fingers as they slide across your keyboard. ![]() Waves slide up and down a sandy shore while the warm sun beats down on your skin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |